Social dilemma cooperation (unlike Dictator Game giving) is intuitive for men as well as women
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Dictator Game Giving: The Importance of Descriptive versus Injunctive Norms
Human behaviour is influenced by social norms but norms can entail two types of information. Descriptive norms refer to what others do in this context, while injunctive norms refer to what ought to be done to ensure social approval. In many real-world situations these norms are often presented concurrently meaning that their independent effects on behaviour are difficult to establish. Here we u...
متن کاملCooperation in Prisoner's Dilemma Game: Influence of Players' Social Roles
The paper aims to extend the findings of a previous study (Grinberg et al., 2012) exploring the impact of social relations on the cooperation in the Prisoner’s dilemma game. Relations between players are manipulated by assigning different roles. The roles embodied the four basic types of human relations in line with Fiske’s relational models theory (Fiske, 1991): communal sharing, authority ran...
متن کاملCooperation in Prisoner's Dilemma Game: Influence of Social Relations
The paper explores the influence of the type of relations among players on cooperation in the Prisoner’s dilemma game. The relations between players are operationalized according to Fiske’s relational models theory (Fiske, 1991): communal sharing, authority ranking, equality matching, and market pricing. This is achieved by using various ways of distributing the total payoff gained by a dyad of...
متن کاملDictator game giving: Rules of fairness versus acts of kindness
In both dictator and impunity games, one player, the dictator, divides a ®xed amount of money between himself and one other, the recipient. Recent lab studies of these games have produced seemingly inconsistent results, reporting substantially divergent amounts of dictator giving. Also, one prominent explanation for some of these di ̈erences, the impact of experimenter observation, displayed wea...
متن کاملSocial heuristics shape intuitive cooperation.
Cooperation is central to human societies. Yet relatively little is known about the cognitive underpinnings of cooperative decision making. Does cooperation require deliberate self-restraint? Or is spontaneous prosociality reined in by calculating self-interest? Here we present a theory of why (and for whom) intuition favors cooperation: cooperation is typically advantageous in everyday life, l...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
سال: 2017
ISSN: 0022-1031
DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2017.06.013